Don’t Spend Money On Women, Have Some Self-Respect!

It is not surprising that the average age of unmarried women is skyrocketing, since more and more men are not willing to get married in this day and age of feminism, draconian laws, and women’s ingratitude. Women then sit and wonder where all the good men have gone.

However, on one hand where we have men who are unwilling to get married, there is no shortage of morons either.

I cannot believe the number of men taking money out their wallets in the blink of an eye for women. How often do women spend on men? Almost never. But there is no shortage of needy, desperate men who think that women will like them if they spend their hard-earned money on them. Men who date women are not morons, but men who let women use their money, take advantage of them, dictate terms, and treat them like dogs are men who have no self-respect.

In my own case, on a date, when it was time to pay we were obviously supposed to split the bill, but the girl’s hand went inside her purse and it didn’t come out until I had paid the entire bill. I think her hand got lost and didn’t know the way out. That was the last time I dated and since then have decided not to spend on women. I will certainly not get married, until I find a woman who is willing not to touch my money after marriage, since she is equal to me (according to feminists). Obviously, when two equal people get married, there is no reason for one to use the other’s money.

Feminists claim that men and women are equal, so the question is, in a marriage why does one gender spend on the other? Why are men supposed to spend on women? Surely both are equal. Even in two-income families, men do the bulk of the spending (women earn pennies anyway). When a woman, claiming to be equal to a man enters the bond of marriage, why does she use her husbands’s money for her expenses? Her food, clothes, shopping, cosmetics, trips to beauty parlors, visits to restaurants, handbags, sandals, vacations, etc, all come from a man’s pocket.

In case of a divorce, a man is ripped off yet again, under the pretext of alimony and child support.What happened to equality? Is equality only applicable when it works in favor of women? Even jobless men are forced to pay alimony, and many commit suicide under the strain courtesy of greedy, cunning, and manipulative wives.

Men who have not yet watched the film ‘Pyar Ka Punchnama’ (both parts) should do so. Not that we need it to tell us how ungrateful, cunning, manipulative, and deceitful women are, but as a breeze of fresh air with all the feminist garbage that Bollywood churns out.

Below is a joke which highlights reality: Women Are Impossible To Please

A brand new store has just opened in New York City that sells Husbands. When women go to choose a husband, they have to follow the instructions at the entrance:

“You may visit this store ONLY ONCE!” There are 6 floors and the value of the products increase as you ascend the flights. You may choose any item from a particular floor, or may choose to go up to the next floor, but you CANNOT go back down except to exit the building! So, a woman goes to the Husband Store to find a husband.

On the 1st floor the sign on the door reads: Floor 1 – These men have jobs.

The 2nd floor sign reads: Floor 2 – These men have jobs and love kids.

The 3rd floor sign reads: Floor 3 – These men have jobs, love kids and are extremely good looking.

“Wow,” she thinks, but feels compelled to keep going.

She goes to the 4th floor and the sign reads: Floor 4 – These men Have Jobs, love kids, are drop-dead good looking and help with housework.

“Oh, mercy me!” she exclaims, “I can hardly stand it!”

Still, she goes to the 5th floor and sign reads: Floor 5 – These men have jobs, love kids, are drop-dead gorgeous, help with housework and have a strong romantic streak.

She is so tempted to stay, but she goes to the 6th floor and the sign reads:

Floor 6 – You are visitor 31,456,012 to this floor. There are no men on this floor. This floor exists solely as proof that women are impossible to please. Thank you for shopping at the Husband Store.

Women do not need love

It is a misconception of staggering proportions that to woo a woman you have to show her love.  That’s what beta males believe and that’s what you see peddled around in movies and in poetry.

The truth is: To woo a woman, you have to INSPIRE love.  That’s what alpha males know.

If you SHOW love, women will know you are a beta.  You can buy presents for her, be nice to her, agree to her vile tantrums, and so on.  She will not fall in love with you because you are already in love with her and she (given her hypergamous nature) will think that she can do better than you.

If you expect to BE loved, women will treat you like a king.  She will cook for you, be nice to you, give you blowjobs, and so on.  Since you are not overtly in love with her yet (or there is some mystery about it), she will regard you as the prize.

Most men make the mistake of showing a woman their love and appreciation, in order to be loved in return.  They make the mistake of giving her something and expecting the same thing in return.

That does not work in the sexual marketplace.  In the sexual marketplace, women are constantly approached by men giving them attention and paying them compliments.  If you do that too, you are one of them.  She is not going to compliment you back.  Never.

If instead, you signal to her that you find her attractive, but that you expect HER to seduce you, that’s what gets them the tingles.  That’s what shows her that you are high value and worth pursuing.

Female Promiscuity = Female Unhappiness

Any society or culture which allows full license to female promiscuity and hypergamy does a disservice to its women, and makes them very, very unhappy.  But once this licentiousness is in place, it is almost impossible to re-introduce sexual restrictions.  For reasons that we will make clear, though women are supremely unhappy in today’s sexual market conditions, any hint that we should go back to traditional restrictions is vociferously and vehemently protested by exactly those women who are the most unhappy and dissatisfied with their relationships.

Now-a-days, the society allows a woman ten to twenty years of premarital sexual “exploration”.  Given the dynamics of casual sex, it is open season for alphas.  They are in hedonistic heaven, taking their pick from a wide array of women.  Betas, however, more than ever, languish in involuntary celibacy or settle for infrequent sex with ugly or drunk women.

Most women in their ten-twenty year period of “fun years” will doubtless come across an alpha or two.  The alpha will game them, provide them multiple orgasms, and having added her to their score of notches, move on.

These “alpha widows” now are damaged goods for any normal man.  They will always compare their current man with the alpha who pumped and dumped them, and find their current man wanting.  They will treat their current man with disdain and will continue to keep their eyes wandering for another alpha like the one they were briefly exposed to.

An alpha widow will not only be a bitch to her man and make him miserable and angry, but she will herself find life to be a pale shadow of what “it could have been”, and be depressed and unhappy.

It is clear that licentiousness has led to her discontentment.  But if you suggest to her that perhaps traditional values (chastity before marriage, divorce only in extreme hardship, lack of easy abortion) should be brought back, she will go ballistic and regard you as her arch enemy.  Why?  Because you are dooming her to alpha widowhood.  She wants to be free to fuck, seduce and possibly entrap an alpha again.  She failed the last time, but how dare you restrain her from trying again?

Alphas will continue to pump and dump, and a delusional woman will continue to hope for an alpha who loves her and only her.  A beta is no good to her, and an alpha will always be beyond her reach.

Mass media is only too happy to feed her delusion.  All the romantic Mills-and-Boon trash, the chick-flicks, the magazines and talk-shows, continue to send her the message that she should trust her heart, and that true love (i.e., love of an alpha) will eventually come her way.

Women want to be free to be hypergamous: they want to be free to pursue their alpha.  But there are only a few alphas in the real world.  These women have tasted alpha cum, and are doomed to be unhappy.

A society which offers sexual freedom and choice to its women destroys their happiness.

Why βs Fail

Why do betas fail with women  To understand this, let’s start with the basics of the sexual marketplace.

Male sexual desire is stronger than in the female.  But so is the male survival skill, his martial and physical acumen, and his ability to provide.  Hence, (A) the male wants to buy the female sex, and to sell his commitment and protection.

By a fundamental law of economics, (B) the more valuable something is in the sexual marketplace, the less available it is.

Couple these two statements (A) and (B), and voila, the mystery is unraveled.  For a woman, to offer her sexuality cheaply marks her as sexually low-value.  Whether she is being a slut because she is low-value, or whether she is seen as low-value because of her sluttiness doesn’t matter.  In the sexual marketplace, both go hand in hand.  And low-value in this case means: no man would want to commit to such a woman.

Similarly, for a man, to offer his commitment and protection cheaply marks him as sexually low-value.  Traditionally, commitment and protection were offered by the woman’s kin or, after her marriage, by her husband.  In the modern world, there are plenty of women who are no longer protected by their kin, are financially self-sufficient, and are single.  For these women, commitment and protection translate into emotional and financial gratification/pleasure by their boyfriend or by her orbiters.

If a man is offering emotional and financial gratification to these women on the cheap (i.e. without any sexual favors from her in return), he is marking himself as low-value.  As before, it doesn’t matter whether he is putting her on a pedestal because he is low-value, or whether he is seen as low-value because of his groveling.  The fact is that he is offering the only thing he has to offer, his emotions and his time, for cheap.  His low-value then translates into: no woman wants to have sex with him.

In short: a slut (a low-value woman) and a beta (a low-value man) are offering their side of the bargain for free.  Hence, they are unattractive.  Men will use sluts for sex and discard them.  Women will use betas as emotional maxipads and discard them.

If you follow so far, then what is the lesson for you as a man?  Do not give your time, attention, Facebook likes, greeting cards, gifts, flowers, to a woman unless she is providing you what you want (i.e. her sexual affection).  And even then, don’t be too available or too eager.

She must win your attention by her femininity.  If you offer your attention to her for free, then she will look for someone who is better than that: who values himself more.

Even if you are in a relationship, you must make it clear by your behavior that you will only be with her and provide her with your company if she is a pleasure to be with: if she offers you something that you want.

A man who debases himself for a woman, is soon debased by his woman as well.

Women Love to Be Used by Alpha Men

An Indian woman writes to the “expert” on The Times of India:

I am 24 years old and in love with a 31-year-old married man who has two children. I met him when I was 18 and he used to live in my neighbourhood. He forced himself on me several times before he got married. But soon after, I started loving him. He used to call me as per his sexual requirement. When I went for higher studies, he didn’t contact me even once. But, when I visited home during my holidays, he called me for the same thing.

I told him several times to talk to me about this relationship but he never bothered. I decided to cut off all contact with him when he told one of my friends that he uses me for his pleasure. Now, it’s been five years and I haven’t contacted him even once. I am now an assistant professor with a reputed college and everything else is going fine in my life but I am unable to forget him. I still love him and haven’t considered relationship with anyone else. He loves his wife and I know whatever I do, he will never realize my love for him.

Notice that —

  • He has the charisma, natural or learned, to “force himself” on her that attracts instead of repulsing her.
  • She was in her teens when he was a twenty-five year old man of marriageable age in India.
  • She is a fucktoy for him and she knows it. And that doesn’t prevent her from developing romantic feelings for him.
  • He forgets about her existence unless there is a possibility of getting sex from her.
  • He “never bothers” to give explanation to her on her inquiries about the nature their relationship.
  • He objectifies and devalues her by telling their friends that she is his bitch.

But she can’t forget him, even after five years of no contact, and loves him such that she can’t consider relationship with anyone else! This despite him being happily married with kids. That is the alpha effect at its best.

Women can’t resist being attracted to men who are psychopathic, callous and emotionally unavailable to them.

Men who treat them like garbage, so far as they have status or charisma, would win any day over white knights.

The testimony of the dark side of their sexuality is the fact that they almost never forget the alpha cads they have been pumped-and-dumped by. Here is another confession by a woman who even after fifty years suffers from the love for the man who took her virginity without giving anything in return.

Eventually, my efforts were rewarded. I was sitting in the library one day when he walked in. I felt white-hot desire and, propelled by almost insane love and longing, walked over to him. From then on, we started a sort of relationship. We would meet at parties and other functions — at which, I have to admit, he paid me scant attention. But I would interpret any little crumb of affection or interest as undying love on his part.

I soon lost my virginity to him, in his room at Henderson Hall, and thought my happiness was complete. I was so besotted that I never even noticed another young man lurking along the corridor, named Bryan Ferry.

The Christmas holidays came and I wondered how I could get through them without him. When I came back, I thought we were an item. But he was still being a very reluctant swain, and although keen enough to have sex, he never once asked me out, or even seemed to want to be seen with me.

I sort of knew it would never come right, yet, wilfully, I ignored all the warning signs. After one of our many nights of passion, more in love with him than ever, if that was possible, I saw him at the top of the steps of the Union Building and ran up to him.

Now, surely, he would return my love. But instead of flinging his arms around me, remembering the wonderful thrill of the night before, he turned away.

He never spoke to me again.

Notice the similarity? Story of women.

We advise men to keep their eyes and minds open for such confessions by women. They are aplenty on the Internet, and they inadvertently provide great lessons for men.

Follow Larry Darrell on Twitter, Facebook, or on WordPress.

Salman Khan: Douchebag or Alpha?

So law has finally caught up with the muscular he-man of the Hindi film industry of the last two decades.

As is usual in Bollywood, he used his connections to get an entry into cinema.  His father is the famous screenwriter Salim Khan, and Helen Richardson (the item girl of early Indian cinema) is his stepmother.  He was “recommended” to Sooraj Barjatya for the role in Maine Pyar Kiya by one Shabina Dutt/Khan whose brother is Afzal Khan.  Family connections?  Quite likely.

Despite being 49 years old, he has remained single so far.  Known to take steroids and drugs, he has dated some of the most well-known actresses, Aishwarya Rai and Katrina Kaif being the most prominent of them.

He is also notorious for being involved in various brawls and criminal incidents, including:

  1. The 2002 hit-and-run case for which he has recently been convicted and sentenced to five years in jail.
  2. Threatening and harassing his ex-girlfriend Rai.
  3. Illegal hunting of black bucks, an endangered species.  For this also he was convicted and sentenced to five years in jail, but he has so far been able to avoid the sentencing through pending appeals and other tactics.

Is Bhai, as he is better known to his fans, a douchebag or a genuine alpha male?

021009093549Salman-Khan-and-his-dog-100209-BP-03

Purushatma defines an alpha male as a natural leader of men.  He has the traits and personality of a strong, dominant man, and excels in one or more fields.  Due to an alpha’s qualities and persona, he is usually very attractive to females, and other males look up to him as a role model and a leader.

However, in Salman Khan’s case, his fame as a (mediocre) brawny actor is responsible for his public adulation.  There are no qualities in him which are worth emulating.  He takes drugs for body-building, is a bad actor who in recent films tries to cover his puffed, drug-addled red eyes with sunglasses, and his baldness with fake hair, and despite being single and famous, suffered from oneitis for his girlfriend who later left him to date and marry other men.

Not every rich, famous cad is an alpha.  These days, celebrities are worshiped by blind sheeple.  But that does not make them admirable.  They have branding teams and PR professionals working for them, and they are famous because they are famous.

Not only is Salman Khan not a role model, he is spoilt, entitled, dumb and nothing more than a parasite on society who makes money from people dumb enough to watch his stupid movies.

None of his roles or films have won any kind of nomination, what to talk of an award, in a film festival.  All his awards have been either by film magazines or by dubious industry associations.  Unlike Arnold Schwarzenegger, who has inspired generations of young men to go to the gym and lift, and who his sheer grit and hard work became one of the most famous men alive, Salman Khan has inspired nobody to become a better man.

Manu Joseph, an erudite Indian journalist, reminiscences thus about his interactions with this spoilt brat:

I have met Salman Khan for a formal interview only once — twelve years ago. Before that, once I spoke to him on the phone for a story. I got his mobile number somehow, and kept calling — he won’t pick up or he would just hang up when I tried to introduce myself. But I think I called him more times than he had called Vivek Oberoi on the night of March 29, 2003, {Oberoi told me that Khan called him 41 times that night to “abuse in the worst language possible and vividly describe how he had sex with his ex-girlfriends (one of whom was Aishwarya Rai).” And Rai was now the girlfriend of Oberoi, the reason Khan was disturbed — just a bit of Indian history for the young}

People wondered why Oberoi kept taking Khan’s calls. The reason was, according to a viral SMS, “His incoming was free.”

I have wondered why Khan kept taking my calls (I would call from various landlines), and my theory is that he was waiting for a call from Ms Rai and it was instead just me. Finally, he answered his phone and said, “What do you want brother?” I told him I am a reporter and that I was working on a story about his desire to kill Oberoi.

Khan sounded surprised that for the purpose of getting his quotes I actually wished to speak to him. He said, “Write whatever you want.” That’s the industry practice he implied. I insisted. And he said, “I am not the best person to talk about myself. You are never the best person to talk about yourself. We all cannot talk about ourselves. One day I will ask you questions about yourself, let me see how many you will answer.”

A few months later I met him for a short profile. The only research I did was calling up a director friend and asking, “Does he really hit people?” I met Khan in a farm house on the outskirts of Bombay. He was bare-chested and cutting his nails with a big knife. He looked at me, and at his nails, and at me and tried to look very menacing. I asked why he didn’t use a nail-cutter like other people. He began to giggle. “It doesn’t work for me,” he said.

I was meeting him to talk about his latest film, which was called, ‘Tere Naam—Unfortunately A True Love Story’. Khan told me, “Unfortunate means ‘sad’. True means ‘pure’.”
He told me that the film was loved by his “classy and massi fans”, which was true.
In the film, he said, and in all his films, “A lot of the hair is mine.”

I told him that according to people, with his performance in ‘Tere Naam – Unfortunately A True Love Story’, “You have crossed a line as an actor.”

“What?”

“You have crossed a line as an actor.”

“Who said that?”

“People.”

“Fools..”

Satish Kaushik, too, said that.

“He would say that. He made the film. He is the director. He’d say it was the best f****** performance I have ever given.”

Khan, like Sanjay Dutt, often turns philosophical. He told me, “After light comes darkness, and…” He lost the thread of the thought somehow, but he eventually found it. “After darkness comes light.”

I found him totally endearing.

Purushatma’s verdict: Salman Khan is a celebrity douchebag, and not an alpha.